Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Vista Alternative

On 2007-02-12, Nick Ballard <nrballardco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:21:28 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> __/ [ Au79 ] on Monday 12 February 2007 05:24 \__
>> 
>>> Why pay over $300 for unstable, but-riddent MS garbage?
>>> 
>>> For a real operating system, check this out:
>>> 
>>> http://funhouse.bubble.ro/483/Vista_Alternative_on_Linux_Using_Beryl/
>> 
>> Does it need 2 gigbytes of memory and a high-end video card? Is it true that
>> 1 in 4 of machines running this thing are in fact under the control of a
>> criminal?
>
> I'm running XGL & Compiz on Ubuntu with a low-end 7000 series nVIDIA card
> with 1GB RAM. Piddly specs where Vista is concerned, but Linux works
> beautifully on it.

As I posted earlier, I'm using a 5900 from NVidia, and everythings
working fine. MS can kiss off.

-- 
An infallible method of conciliating a tiger is to allow oneself to be
devoured.
		-- Konrad Adenauer

http://www.websterscafe.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index