__/ [ Kier ] on Sunday 11 February 2007 11:38 \__
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:43:06 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> __/ [ RonB ] on Saturday 10 February 2007 23:46 \__
>>
>>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:29:27 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> When I was using Live CDs at home I suspect there just wasn't enough
>>>> RAM. The volatility of the data (including settings) and speed were
>>>> deterrents. Still, it is good for testing and demonstration.
>>>
>>> Did you ever try SLAX?
>>
>> I haven't. The review which linux.com had the other day wasn't so
>> positive.
>
> Realy? I'm quite surprised at that, to be honest. I've generally found
> SLAX to be one of the most reliable Live CDs around. It's also in pretty
> active development most of the time. What did the reviewer have to say?
Oops. Oops. Oops.
http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/02/05/1436202
It was STUX, not SLAX. My bad.
By the way, judging by your two last posts, I am happy to see that I'm not
the only one writing my messages sloppily and leaving typos abound.
Proofreading has its merits, but doing it IM style means that there's more
room for expression, less for saving face.
--
~~ Best wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | GNU is Not Universal (begin recursion)
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 134 total, 1 running, 129 sleeping, 0 stopped, 4 zombie
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
|
|
