John A. Bailo wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>
>> AmaroK still puts to shame many proprietary counterparts. It's recent
>> versions are stable and relatively bug-free.
>
> Yes, I thouroughly agree!
>
> I can leave amarok sitting in the system tray as if it weren't even
> running. Contrast that with the tempermental Real Player or Win Media
> player for Windows, which are feature stuffed and crash prone at almost
> every click of the interface.
>
> It also nicely intergrates the concepts of media browsing, streaming and
> just playing downloadable files. One nice addition (if it doesn't
> already have it) would be to make it a podcast aggregator (be able to
> input RSS URLs and have it grab the latest shows).
>
Oh, yeah -- and it doesn't floor the CPU to 100% just by playing a 22K
stream!
--
Texeme Construct
updated 1/4 http://john-bailo.blogspot.com/
updated often http://you-read-it-here-first.com
|
|
