On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:13:57 GMT, Ian Semmel <rocketLinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:56:20 -0500, flatfish+++ wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:40:22 -0500, Rick wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:49:57 -0500, flatfish+++ wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2079201,00.asp
>>>>
>>>> "This is the second major flaw to affect OpenOffice, which supports the
>>>> OpenDocument standard for data interchange. In April 2005, the open-source
>>>> group was forced to rush out a fix for a buffer overflow that put users at
>>>> risk of code execution attacks."
>>>
>>> What? No comments from you about security flaws in Microsoft Office and
>>> Windows?
>>
>> This is a Linux group, not a Windows group.
>>
>> Unlike others around here, most notably Roy Schestowitz, I do my best to
>> stay on topic.
>The trouble is, the cola's have said that linux doesn't have security
>vulnerabilities so many times that they actually believe it.
all zero of them.
|
|
