On 2007-01-05, [H]omer <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Handover Phist wrote:
>> On 2007-01-05, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Linux XP: Review
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | Linux XP does an admirable job of mimicing Windows XP?s behavior,
>>> | so a typical XP user may find switching to LXP very easy. At the
>>> | same time, the more fundamental question I?d ask is, if you are
>>> | switching to Linux, why bother retaining windows XP layout, when
>>> | Linux has better options?
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.nsharp.org/01/linux-xp-review/
>>
>> "Strangely, Open office was not included in the installation, which is a
>> pity"
>>
>> It seems it copies XP quite well!
>>
>> "The second problem with LXP (in my opinion) is that it is a paid OS -
>> i.e. you have to pay to obtain a licence."
>>
>> Really REALLY well!
>
> Ah, but does it b0rk your system with WGA?
>
> No?
>
> Phfff!
Hey, nobody's perfect. Besides, do you know how long it wold take to
implement all of XPs flaws in Linux? I can just imagine how big the
kernel would get with firefox compiled right in...
--
The San Francisco police are nothing if not sensitive to the mood of the
community. The word is that Dirty Harry has been replaced by Bitchy Gerald.
http://www.websterscafe.com
|
|
