In comp.os.linux.advocacy, 7
<website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:59:41 GMT
<Nxgnh.25796$k74.12622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> flatfish+++ wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:19:10 -0600, Tom Shelton wrote:
>>
>>> On 2007-01-04, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> REAL Software Ships REALbasic 2007 Release 1
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>| REALbasic is a full-featured software development environment
>>>>| suited to creating all kinds of applications, from utilities
>>>>| to enterprise-class applications. REALbasic for Windows or Mac
>>>>| is priced at $200, with an introductory price of $99. REALbasic
>>>>| for Linux Standard Edition is offered for free.
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> http://www.linuxelectrons.com/News/Application
> REAL_Software_Ships_REALbasic_2007_Release_1
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/sq4ce
>>>>
>>>> Another reason to work under Linux, if Basic is at all needed.
>>>
>>> Why? I can get VB.NET 2005 Express for free for windows. And looking at
>>> the feature list, I would say that VB2005 Express has as many if not more
>>> features...
>>
>> Roy Schestowitz is not one to let facts get in the way of advocating
>> Linux.
>
>
> I have often noted that nobody listens to a fool like you.
> Are you licensed to print this kind of distorted rubbish?
>
An interesting notion...but who would want to license us? :-)
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/dev/signature: Resource temporarily unavailable
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
