-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:20:13 -0500,
Oliver Wong <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:2466995.JSvd6KvJoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Protect Linux / UNIX application from buffer overflows
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | A Buffer overflows is a serious security problem. It allows an
>> | attacker to inject executable code of their choice into an
>> | already-running application. With such problems in mind, Berger
>> | created a new program that prevents crashing and makes users safer.
>> `----
>>
>> http://technocrat.net/d/2007/1/1/12815
>
> When it was discovered that Vista offered a similar feature, this
> newsgroup ridiculed the approach, saying it would make software slower, and
> asked why didn't Microsoft just fix their broken software, instead of
> applying this "ugly hack".
>
my, what a broad brush you wield.
So, when "this grou" did as you claim, you were right there, making the
same monkey noises?
Or did you really mean "some in this group"?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFnJUXd90bcYOAWPYRAggmAKDPuOgjWrGbDvyp31KcKj/CphsrSwCgl16U
k/WG/JoQtRA9CxWmJwJxo/0=
=fZnL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Words fail me. Thank goodness I can make gestures.
-- Mark Hughes (in asr - 2001
|
|
