On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:01:00 +0000, wjbell wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [ Tattoo Vampire ] on Wednesday 03 January 2007 16:05 \__
>>
>>> Larry Qualig wrote:
>>>
>>>> I read the entire article. Nowhere in the article does the reviewer
>>>> "bash" Vista or the laptop. So why are you lying again?
>>>
>>> The writer does have a few dislikes about the OS:
>>>
>>> #1:
>>> Maybe the dialog should be a bit more cautious. Just because I started a
>>> program doesn't mean it's safe to run it.
>>>
>>> #2:
>>> To be honest, I wasn't that impressed with Vista's Aero windowing system.
>>> Yes, the 3-D with shadowing stuff is nice and yes the semi-transparent
>>> windows are cool, but for me it's no big-deal improvement over XP's
>>> windows. We'll see if this judgment holds over the month.
>>>
>>> #3:
>>> If truth be told, my first app install on Vista didn't go entirely
>>> smoothly.
>>>
>>> Not much criticism at all from the writer...
>>
>> ...Who receive a free laptop owing to his status. Microsoft flip-flopping on
>> its return policy won't help here. When you send someone a $3000 laptop, you
>> expect little or no criticism.
>
> No, what that does is take out the hardware variable and let the person
> review the _operating system_.
>
>> The review is also biased because of the
>> hardware specs. The the equivalent of taking a test drive with Sylvia Saint
>> giving you a blowjob.
>>
>
> No acknowledgment of your exaggeration?
>
> Interesting.
Why should he?
Narcissistic people are never wrong, at least that is what they believe.
It's always the other people, the grunts of the world, that are wrong.
It's obvious Roy Schestowitz has a problem telling the truth.
|
|
