Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: What should a modern website really have?

  • Subject: Re: What should a modern website really have?
  • From: "DFS" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:46:00 -0500
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
  • References: <1250869.dYjiI0ax5W@schestowitz.com> <2Dxjh.1724$h21.946@newsfe08.lga> <jgfq64-v76.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> <8vwmh.18$vX6.0@newsfe12.lga> <GGwmh.17410$h_1.6095@bignews6.bellsouth.net> <%Lwmh.33$rK5.19@newsfe11.lga>
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:475562
flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:32:29 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> flatfish+++ wrote:
>>
>>> I happen to feel that Roy Schestowitz's site is an example of what I
>>> would call a very well, actually, extremely well done website.
>>
>> It's hideous!
>>
>> It reflects the confused mind of its subject.
>
> The content or the layout?
> I kind of like the layout but I am partial to blues.

I like blue, too, but the layout is fugly.  Bunch of different fonts/sizes. 
Strange graphics.  Weird navigation.  Inscrutable icons.  Bad word wrapping, 
etc.

The content is bogus, too, of course.  Somewhere he has an entire page 
devoted to his cola killfile.

I'm more partial to a site laid out and navigable like www.msnbc.com or 
www.homedepot.com






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index