On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:30:21 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ nrballardco@xxxxxxxxx ] on Monday 01 January 2007 06:55 \__
>
>>
>> Sinister Midget wrote:
>>> On 2006-12-31, William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something
>>> concerning:
>>> > It was on or about Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:45:34 +0000, that Roy Schestowitz
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> __/ [ Erik Funkenbusch ] on Sunday 31 December 2006 09:49 \__
>>> >
>>> ><snip garbage>
>>> >
>>> >> That's Erik "drama drama drama" Funkenbusch.
>>> >>
>>> >> Grow up please. The BBC was acknowledged when I, as a 22 year old,
>>> >> first put up such images in a new blog (shortly afterwards moving to
>>> >> http://www.sxc.hu/ ) . Here. Let me help you.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/01/06/a-lazy-boy/
>>> >>
>>> >> OMG! What a thief.
>>> >
>>> > Ewik doing his Drama Queen act, is he. IMO he's just clutching at
>>> > straws, Roy. Carry on with the good work! :-)
>>>
>>> I think I understand what Erik's Super Duper Anti-Roy Drive Line is all
>>> about now. Somebody asks him what his plan was, he attacks Roy without
>>> any basis in reality.
>>>
>> It's scary and sad, really, but I suppose that's what the Wintrolls do.
>> Who could expect anything more from them?
>
> That's why you should ignore anything they ever say about your dad. Some of
> the things they say in this thread are lies which they repeat over and over
> again, so I just can't bother to set the record straight. If they repeat the
> lies many times (from different mouth), it's a brute-force thing. It's a
> DDOS attack that's time-consuming to combat. Why else would someone bother
> writing a 400-line message elaborating on things...?
You've just described Rex to a T.
Ooops... that wasn't what you meant, right?
|
|
