Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Gimp vs. Photoshop
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | The truth is, they're both winners when they're used in the proper
> | context. The Gimp just doesn't have support in the areas that are
> | necessary to make it useful in a commercial application. However,
> | you cannot justify the price of Photoshop for personal use when the
> | Gimp will do everything it can do outside of commercial printing. I
> | know I've beat the horse to death, but unless you want to pirate
> | software, there is no reason to use Photoshop if you're not producing
> | a print publication ? use the Gimp.
> `----
>
> http://grimthing.com/archives/2007/01/11/Gimp_vs_Photoshop/
BAWAWWAWAWWWAAWWWAWAAA
You and article are to stupid to know that Photoshop is often free with
digital camera.
Free Photoshop kicks ass over LIMP crapware like gimp.
|
|
