Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Alan Cox files defensive patent ..

  • Subject: Re: Alan Cox files defensive patent ..
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:28:07 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <1168867829.287374.81890@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <F3Mqh.4120$Yy1.3452@textfe.usenetserver.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ yttrx ] on Monday 15 January 2007 14:19 \__

> Doug Mentohl <doug_mentohl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "if this patent is granted it is likely that they will choose not to
>> license this technology, and instead, sue for any use of it as a
>> defense of OSS"
>> 
>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=2574359
>> 
> 
> Uhh...yeah.  Not even alan cox can patent prior art, thanks.

But, dude, it's no art. It's BS with acronyms reversed.

Digital? Management? Rights?

more like:

Binary. Messiness. Restrictions.


-- 
                        ~~ Best regards

Roy S. Schestowitz      | Linux: just set it and forget about it
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem:    514480k total,   483812k used,    30668k free,     5592k buffers
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index