__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Saturday 13 January 2007 19:51 \__
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Hans Schneider <hans_schneider@xxxxxx> espoused:
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Internet Explorer Still Cannot Be Removed From Windows
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | Groklaw has an article arguing that Microsoft has not yet complied
>>> | with the DOJ order that users must be able to remove Internet Explorer
>>> | from Windows.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=16919
>>>
>>> Competitive advantage (or abuse) aside, security implications should be
>>> worrisome. Not to mention encouragement of proprietary 'extensions'. As
>>> long as many people use Windows, banks, for example, can insist that
>>> people use IE.
>>
>> What is this to be doing with Linux??
>
> Microsoft is being the most significant competition to linux adoption,
> so when Microsoft are doing law breaking, linux affected be. Relevent
> it is. Verb I end of sentence put can.
Hadron Quark is 'new' to this group. His 'Second Life' (incarnation) permits
him to (re-)show skepticism of my actions.
--
~~ Best regards
Roy S. Schestowitz | Data lacking semantics is currency in an island
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
9:05pm up 87 days 7:19, 7 users, load average: 0.42, 0.75, 0.85
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project
|
|
