Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Nordic bank hacked ..

  • Subject: Re: Nordic bank hacked ..
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:15:04 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <1169295867.297109.119650@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169817854.551016.320360@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Ewok ] on Friday 26 January 2007 13:24 \__

> On Jan 20, 1:24 pm, "Doug Mentohl" <doug_ment...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "Phishing gangs have managed to steal about ?900,000 from accounts at
>> Swedish bank Nordea since last autumn using a Trojan horse, according
>> to Computer Sweden"
>>
> 
> It isn't that strange. Nordea has had problems with phishing for a
> while now. Every time anyone critisized their security, since it
> doesn't happen to other banks, they just shrug it of by saying: They
> only attack us, because we are the largest bank.
> 
> Were do I recognize that kind of argument from?
> 
> /Your friendly neighbourhood Ewok

An argument of convenience. At the same time failing to see that the lack of
security is a result of design flaws, which hundreds of million of lines of
code (complexity) make difficult -- if not impossible -- to change...

Linux Security: A Big Edge Over Windows

,----[ Quote ]
| Linux is better at locking down a computer than Windows. The Linux OS
| uses configuration settings and user permissions to a much more
| efficient degree than the Windows administrator account. To do
| this, non-enterprise users should seek help from third-party
| security suites that serve as configuration managers, James
| Bottomley, chief technology officer of SteelEye Technology said.
`----

http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/54742.html


Security Report: Windows vs Linux

,----[Executive summary ]
| Finally, we also include a brief overview of relevant conceptual
| differences between Windows and Linux, to offer an insight into why
| Windows tends to be more vulnerable to attacks at both server and desktop,
| and why Linux is inherently more secure
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/security/security_report_windows_vs_linux/


Microsoft Windows: Insecure by Design

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34978-2003Aug23?language=printer


If Only We Knew Then What We Know Now About Windows XP

,----[ Quote ]
| You can think of Windows XP as a house with a second floor built of
| spackle, wood filler and duct tape.
`----

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/23/AR2006092300510.html?nav=rss_technology


Why Windows is a security nightmare.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/21/1085120110704.html


The Structural Failures of Windows

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=15305


-- 
                        ~~ Best wishes 

Roy S. Schestowitz      | "Web 2.0 is everything that can be spammed"
--Unknown
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap:  1036184k total,   398712k used,   637472k free,    93424k cached
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index