begin oe_protect.scr
thad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <thad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What's this have to do with Linux advocacy? (What's it have to do with
>> Linux at all?)
>
> I don't know, but it is at least geeky and a bit interesting, which is
> more than can be said for much of the off-topic trolling in this group.
> Nevertheless, if proper and civil functioning of usenet is to be
> maintained, Roy must be mercilessly flogged with a copy of RFC 977 and
> the Usenet Netiquette Guidelines. Such indiscretions must not go
> unpunished! >:)
>
Tim Smith consistently posts anti-charter material here. He should not
be here, and he knows this very well. His constant attacks on Roy's
postings are to hide the fact that Timmy is posting anti-charter
material on a regular basis. I would far rather have off-topic than
anti-charter material here.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
Whom the mad would destroy, first they make Gods.
-- Bernard Levin
|
|