On Jul 1, 1:43 pm, Maverick <S...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> > ____/ Maverick on Friday 29 June 2007 21:17 : \____
>
> >>Tim Smith wrote:
>
> >>>In article <5167132.z5sp3ja...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>>>I think the name is wrong. This is Tim:
>
> >>>>http://digg.com/users/harlowsmonkeys
>
> >>>>I'm ~80% it's Tim Smith. He replied to about 100 comments of mine (sometimes
> >>>>f**kwit replies, sometime discrediting the person, not the comment) and the
> >>>>content strongly suggested it was a Tim nym (hey, it rhymes!).
>
> >>>I thought you would have learned your lesson on lying about Digg content
> >>>after the pwnage you suffered over your Rod Trent claims. Do you really
> >>>need me to dig up all my comments that have been replies to your
> >>>comments, and show that you are lying in your characterization of them?
>
> > So you *are* harlowsmonkeys.
>
> >>>Your definition of "f**kwit reply" seems to be "a reply that points out
> >>>an error in your comment, or a contradiction with positions you've taken
> >>>in other comments". If you don't want those kinds of replies, you could
> >>>consider stopping making errors, and taking consistent positions.
>
> >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Isn't that just too bad. Ever heard of free
> >>speech, or are you one of the liberal communists that is against freedom
> >>of speech?
>
> > Freedom of speech is one thing, but you never run naked in a church. The trolls
> > have no place in a Linux forum, no matter what they say. You never walk over
> > to your neighbour's laws to take a wee. That's what you have a loo for.
> > Introducinggg.... the Windows advocacy group -- USENET's loo.
>
> Of course. Also note my use of "Porch monkey" in relation to the
> wintrolls... it seems to have stirred up the wintrolls a lot. >:->
Say it out in public and see who it stirs up.
|
|
