OOXML Fails to Gain Approval in US
,----[ Quote ]
| On Friday July 13th, INCITS V1 met via teleconference for 3 hours but failed
| to reach a 2/3 consensus necessary to recommend an "Approval, with comments"
| position on Microsoft "Office Open XML" (OOXML) document specification.
`----
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/07/ooxml-fails-to-gain-approval-in-us.html
Related:
WordProcessing ML Sub-Committee [Why Ecma OOXML cannot be regarded as a
free/open document standard]
,----[ Quote ]
| "OpenXML is designed to represent the existing corpus of documents
| faithfully, even if that means preserving idiosyncrasies that one
| might not choose given the luxury of starting from a clean slate. In
| the ODF design, compatibility with and preservation of existing Office
| documents were not goals. Each set of goals is valuable; sacrificing
| either at the expense of the other may not be in the best interest of
| users." (p.6 Ecma Response)
`----
http://wordprocessingml.pbwiki.com/
OOXML: The Formula for Failure
,----[ Quote ]
| As I've shown, in the rush to write a 6,000 page standard in less than a
| year, Ecma dropped the ball. OOXML's spreadsheet formula is worse than
| missing. It has incorrect formulas that, if implemented according to the
| standard may cause loss of life, property and capital. This standard is
| seriously messed up. And shame on all those who praised and continue to
| praise the OOXML formula specification without actually reading it.
`----
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/07/formula-for-failure.html
Mathematically Incorrect
,----[ Quote ]
| So when it comes to comparing MSOOXML and ODF v1.0 on the basis of the
| inclusion of "Formula Definitions", it becomes clear that the anti-ODF folk
| have not much to shout about. In fact MSOOXML's "Formula Definition" is
| deficient and inaccurate.
`----
http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2007/07/mathematically-.html
|
|
