"Big Bill" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6tpha3pbmamheovmr18nl7aenemdd7c209@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:00:53 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>____/ Big Bill on Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:57 : \____
>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:38:56 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>____/ Ignoramus27155 on Tuesday 24 July 2007 14:19 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:13:19 +0100, John <johng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>>>>>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a colleague who believes using
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.mystore.com/blah/product-name.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> will give an SEO advantage over using
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.mystore.com/page.asp?productid=3D1234
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when someone searches for "product name" - Are they right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely.
>>>>>
>>>>> i
>>>>
>>>>I've just reead (based on something that Cutts announced) that
>>>>underscores
>>>>will now be treated as word separators. That changes the game slightly.
>>>
>>> Where was this please? First I heard and it sounds like someone
>>> interpreting something someone else said so I'd like a firsthand look.
>>
>>I think it was WebProNews where I read this. I believe it was announced in
>>some
>>conference. The source seemed credible.
>
> I found several references, yup, real deal ok.
>
> BB
> --
>
Here it is:
http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9748779-7.html
cheers ~
Denise
|
|
