waterskidoo <water.skidoo@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2007-07-27, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:33:00 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> When I came to think about it, the shills won in a way. I no longer submit many
>>> stories that criticise or expose Microsoft. When I did, then quite
>>> immediately, the 'usual suspects' would strike within minutes or hours. You
>>> can find like 10-30 comments on Comes vs Microsoft submissions that never even
>>> made the front page (they got buried beforehand). Many of them still have PR5,
>>> so a simply Google search leads to them (like a gateway to a PDF that cannot
>>> be interpreted).
>>
>> No, Roy. You are completely dense and unable to comprehend the truth.
>>
>> The fact of the matter is, you made enemies on Digg. Lots of them.
>> Because you posted your usual fraudulent headlines and made inappropriate
>> and off-topic comments. Digg users don't like that, and they retaliated
>> against you. For example, when you accused a particular blogger of only
>> posting pro-microsoft stories when only a few of his hundreds of stories
>> were microsoft related.
>>
>> You seem unable to understand how your attitude and actions cause people to
>> dislike you. You're only conclusion is that they must be paid shills,
>> because you can't conceive that people might not actually like what you
>> say, or how you say it, or the methods you use to say it.
>>
>> Why don't you take a good hard look at yourself, your posting history, the
>> comments people have made to you, etc..
>
> I think it's human nature to assume that a person who posts a large
> number of messages must have some ulterior motive.
Of course he does have an ulterior motive or he wouldn't do it. Roy is
all about Roy.
> This is especially true in the type of forums we are talking
> about *advocacy, digg, etc.
> Go into a Toyota group and start posting all kinds of pro-Toyota
> messages and people are going to assume you are a shill for
> Toyota.
--
|
|
