On 2007-07-28, DFS <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think it's pathetic, actually. Many in that list are children in adult
> bodies, bleating about the imaginary MS monster in the closet.
I read their posts and comment.
Do you know something I don't?
>> The same could be said of Enron, before it collapsed.
> Show us.
Google Enron.
Why do you think it failed?
>> The same could be said of MCI, before it collapsed.
> Show us.
See above
>> The same could be said of the executives of Pan American Airlines
>> before they collapsed.
> Show us.
See above
>> The same could be said of Gerstner who sold a ton of shares right
>> before IBM announeced less than Wall Streets projected profits.
> Show us.
See above.
>> See a pattern here?
>
> Yes I do. You persist in uninformed idiocy, and in parroting the "MS is the
> next Enron!" stupidity only Linux "advocates" dream about.
Wrong.
What I am saying is that you have to look at a company, it;s executives and
study their moves to see where the company is going.
When high ranking executives in a particular company start selling
their shares, I am interested.
To answer your question, I don't believe MS is the next Enron, not
by a long shot.
However, I do believe MS is in trouble because they seem to be
doing everything wrong these days and the average consumer
is a lot smarter than in the past.
It's not inconceivable to see MS as the next Enron, in the
future.
|
|
