On 2007-07-27, anon@xxxxxxxx <anon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
>>And usually, IMO, they'll be wrong. It may occasionally be true,
>>but I doubt it's nearly as widespread as some people believe it is.
>>No one is surprised when Linux fans posts a lot of pro-Linux stuff,
>>against MS, so why is anyone surprised that MS/Windows fans do
>>likewise in the opposite direction?
>
>>Just being pro-Windows or even anti-Linux doesn't endow a person
>>with a tail and horns.
>
> But we're talking about zealots. And the opinions of zealots are
> absolutely worthless. Obviously some things done with linux are
> better than the counterpart on windoze, and vice versa. A
> reasonable linux fan is able to admit a linux weakness, take a look
> at how a windoze solution solves the problem, and then work to make
> linux better.
>
> But the linux zealot, who comprise the largest proportion of the
> moronic element that populates the linux newsgroups, will argue that
> linux is superior in every way and within a paragraph or two of his
> posting you realize that you have stumbled across yet another idiot
> whose effective mission in life is to waste your time.
>
> The linux zealot is the worst enemy linux can have. We shit hard on
> the linux zealot. We ask him to open his mouth, we squat above him,
> and we squeeze one off. Just for him. And the really hilarious
> thing is that the linux zealot is so starved that he keeps coming
> back for more and more and more.
>
> cordially, as always,
>
> rm
Does Penthouse still publish those readers forum letters?
You know, the ones with so called sexual encounters.
If so, I'd be willing to wager you could get yours
printed.
|
|
