Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Jim Richardson belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's a thought: just for some variety, why don't you and Roy try
>>> actually making an argument that isn't ad hominem?
>>
>> What part of that was an ad hominem?
>
> The part where I say that Timmy is a whining, irritating twat?
>
Hehe - spilt m' tea!
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |
|
|
