Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <b6qjn4-gms.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> > Microsoft partner: Is the $199 PC doomed to fail?
>> >
>> > http://news.com.com/2010-1005_3-6198367.html?part=rss&tag=2547-1_3-0-20&subj
>> > =news
>> >
>> > Watch where he comes from and watch the comments. His company sells Windows
>> > PCs
>> > that Linux laptops are a competitive threat to. Why does C|Net carry on
>> > publish these anti-Linux, anti-GPL, anti-EU, anti-ODF placements?
>>
>> I wonder if we should look at a few FAQ updates - one might include
>> listing the various news organs and their affiliation, as well as some
>> of the more obvious paid shill types, like Laura DiDio, say, or even
>> some key people in major organisations who're making dangerous mistakes,
>> like Ashley Highfield (of whom I suspect incompetence rather than
>> malice).
Mark Kent : a pompous windbag if ever there is one. More ad hominem
attacks on people he knows NOTHING about. "I suspect". Give it
up. You're not Inspector Morse you know.
>>
>> Thoughts, anyone?
>
> Here's a thought: just for some variety, why don't you and Roy try
> actually making an argument that isn't ad hominem?
They don't know how.
They don't advocate Linux. They just slander people and products with
little, if any, corroborating evidence.
--
|
|
