7 <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
> Nerdwizard wrote:
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> Wubuntu
>>>
>>> Pretty amazing stuff... there's also something like this for Windows XP,
>>> but it's far less powerful.
>>>
>>> http://wubuntu.weejewel.net/
>>
>> U
> Using the Fxxx word, twice, to describe the failure of IE to properly
> display Wubuntu, just does work for those of us who are responsible
> for turning clippy worshipping asstroturfers from the 'dark side'.
>
> So, gee, it is a neat thing you did, weejewel, but, you really fxxked up
> and have killed off over half of the potential audience who thought
> windummies were better!
> No Micoshaft Corporation teacher would dare risk showing this web site in
> Computer Science class! They would know their time is wasted because
> open source is so much more advanced than before.
7...
Shut up for 5 seconds and THINK.
The word fuck is there on the opening page twice and bastard is in the
wastebin.
Or do you think such language is appropriate for primary schools?
Is it even appropriate to promote a product?
How is "It's empty, you bastard" helping anyone? Does ubuntu say that when
you click on an empty wastebin?
> Come back here when you have ditched it (windummy experiences), so we can
> promote it in Math Camp Summer classes! That is if you are still needed at
> all as all Nerds are switching to Open Source even if you are not.
Look, fuck off 7, ok. He had a very VERY valid criticism. He's on OUR SIDE.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
