__/ [ Linonut ] on Saturday 09 June 2007 13:13 \__
> After takin' a swig o' grog, 7 belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> It suggests there should a strong law against IP racketeering.
>> It would be illegal to sign any deals under contract law without
>> specifying specific IP protection or none at all.
>> That way companies and investors are protected from non-specificity
>> of any deals they sign.
>>>
>>> Court: Microsoft, Best Buy must stand trial for racketeering
>>>
>>> http://www.centralvalleybusinesstimes.com/stories/001/?ID=5059
>
> It bears repeating.
And oldie (and nonetheless a goodie):
Linux: What do you get if you add Microsoft and Novell?
,----[ Quote ]
| What does the wikipedia say about protection rackets?
| I'll add my comments in brackets {..}. These may or may not be
| accurate:
|
| "A protection racket is an extortion scheme whereby a powerful
| organization {Microsoft?}, most often a criminal organization or gang,
| coerces individuals {you} or businesses {you} to pay protection money{
| SUSE subscription fee} which allegedly serves to purchase the
| organization's "protection" services {"patent peace of mind",
| S. Ballmer*} against various external threats {patent lawyers}.
| Those who do not buy into the protection plan {Novell subscription}
| are often targeted by criminals existing outside of the organization
| {Microsoft lawyers}. These crimes are typically thought to originate
| from the organization itself. When a business refuses to pay for
| protection, word is put out that they are outside of the local
| organisation's protection (these organisations often exist in the
| absence of a trusted police force) and that the business in question
| is therefore free game for freelance criminals {IP law firms} or
| the organization itself.
|
| The protection money is typically collected by a "Bag Man"
| {Novell*}. Although the organization might be particularly
| coercive in obtaining protection money, it is usually careful
| to shelter {with IP protected protocols/services} its "mark"
| from attacks by competitor organizations {SCO?} that similarly
| attempt to solicit or threaten the targeted individuals or
| businesses. Disputes between organizations concerning "turf" or
| territory {market share} consequently arise from two competing
| predators attempting to extort from the same "clients." {linux users} "
`----
http://www.encke.net/Article11.html
--
~~ Enjoying summertime
Roy S. Schestowitz | < http://debian.org >
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
roy pts/8 Sat Jun 9 10:55 - 10:56 (00:00)
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
|
|
