Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Linux] Firefox 3 Reaches Alpha 5, Anoter 'Relative' Introduced

Firefox 3 Alpha 5 is out

,----[ Quote ]
| A little more than a month after Alpha 4 and a week later that the 
| scheduled May 30 release date, Mozilla has released the fifth alpha 
| of Firefox 3.
`----

http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/firefox-3-alpha-5-is-out/

Kazehakase brings innovation to the browser

,----[ Quote ]
| Nowadays, half the free software world seems to be building 
| Gecko-based browsers (and the other half writing plugins for 
| them). With so many available, you might think the Kazehakase 
| browser would hardly rate a mention. However, Kazehakase 
| breaks away from the pack by being one of the few browser 
| projects that is actually thinking of new features and 
| ways to enhance old ones.
`----

http://community.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/05/25/1449244&from=rss

Linux.com screenshot in the article (with Microsoft's anti-Linux FUD as an
advert). They make money writing about Linux, by embedding anti-Linux lies.
Sad.


Related:

Fast forward with a Kazehakase web browser

,----[ Quote ]
| But all things considered, this is one hell of a browser in the making
| and is certainly going to be a serious contender to Firefox, at least
| among GNU/Linux users, if its succesful development continues. It has
| quite a few aces up its sleeve, supports the standard needs and is yet
| so much less memory hungry. It sure looks like a winner.
`----

http://www.nuxified.org/article/kazehakase_review 


,----[ Quotes with annotation ]
| "(Microsoft manager:) I don't like the fact that the report show us losing 
| on TCO on webservers. I don't like the fact that the report show us losing 
| on availability (windows was down more than linux). And I don't like the 
| fact that the reports says nothing new is coming with windows .net server."
| 
| [...]
| 
| "I don't like it to be public on the doc that we sponsored it because I 
| don't think the outcome is as favorable as we had hoped. I just don't like 
| competitors using it as ammo against us. It is easier if it doesn't mention 
| that we sponsored it."
`----

http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/9000/PX09695.pdf


Slashdot promotes windows!

,----[ Quote ]
| This ad appeared on this mornings reload of Slashdot.org. It
| ran big bold headlines "LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE CHOOSES WINDOWS
| OVER LINUX FOR RELIABILITY!" and stopped at the frame shown here.
| The implication is "Windows is more reliable than Linux in server 
| environments. You should run Windows Server 2003 if you want to
| succeed."
`----

http://planet-geek.com/archives/003510.html


Fighting Claims That Open Source Is Insecure?

,----[ Quote ]
| Lately there has been a HUGE push by Certified Microsoft
| Professionals and their companies to call clients and warn
| them of the dangers of open source. This week I received calls
| from 4 different customers that they were warned that they are
| dangerously insecure because they run Open Source Operating
| systems or Software because 'anyone can read the code and hack
| you with ease' they are being told. Other colleagues in the area
| also have noticed this about 3 Microsoft Partners or so they claim
| have been going out of their way to strike fear of OSS in
| companies that respond with 'yes we use Open source or Linux'
| when the sales call comes in.
`----

http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/01/0413212&from=rss


Reviewing a Microsoft anti-Linux case study

,----[ Quote ]
| The answer is that neither Linux nor Solaris nor any other Unix variant is 
| mentioned in this report; Microsoft simply hung an anti-Linux label on a 
| very carefully worded story about a pair of committed Microsoft partners, 
| HP and Accenture, getting together with Microsoft to sell rather simple 
| technology to a willing customer - whose employers, I think, should be 
| seriously embarrassed.
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/index.php?p=739

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index