Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Peter Köhlmann ] on Saturday 02 June 2007 16:59 \__
>
>> Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>> In article <rig7j4-71j.ln1@xxxxxxxxxx>, "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> ngstats.pl version 1.22
>>>>
>>>> Written by Roy Culley.
>>>> Contributions from Mark Kent.
>>>> Modifications by [H]omer, 2007.
>>>
>>> Roy said you could publish the code, so why don't you? Don't you want
>>> people to be able to verify the accuracy of your stats?
>
> These repetitive posts of yours have become tedious. You are acting like a
> 5-year-old.
>
> "Mom, are we there yet?"
>
> "Are we there yet?"
>
> "Mom, are we there yet?"
>
> "Are we there yet?"
>
> You could probably cron it like [H]omer, but at least [H]omer's utput is
> dynamic.
>
>
>> I would not either when asked by twits like you are Hadron Quark
>
>
> Who or what is Hadron Quark?
A windows troll, posing as a "linux user"
You know, like flatfishs "SuSE reports", where that twit claimed to actually
like linux.
It is the very same pattern with Hadron Quark, who claims to be a "true
linux advocate", "kernel hacker", "emacs user" and "swapfile expert"
--
We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms.
|
|
