"John Locke" <johnlocke98513@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jtfi73tmi0ngm66emhp8pkf6jm5ekrubsu@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:30:30 -0400, "Dr. Shlongwell"
> <dShlong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Damn idiot and liar. Nowhere does the article say anthing about this being
>>a
>>"Serious Flaw" you retard. So quit making up shite as you go along. Quit
>>being a dishonest bitch and post what the story actually says, not what
>>you
>>wish it says.
> "An attacker could use the flaw as part of a social-engineering ploy,
> where users are tricked into doing something that puts their machine
> at risk. For example, victims could receive an instant message from
> someone who appears to have his boss's e-mail address."
>
> That would be considered serious by many people.
Then show me someone credible who calls this serious. Roy Schestowitz
doesn't count as he is an idiot. Is there a secunia security advisory out on
this? Where can I find the security bulletin and security advisory on this
oh so serious flaw.
A loser like you ought to try this for a change - quit sucking up to your
boyfriend and deal with the facts for a change. This 'serious flaw' simply
lets somebody type in a bogus email address into their online profile.
Wow-wee.
And to Gordon - Most any email app/service lets people set their display
name to anything they want. If someone is stupid enough to fall for it then
they are born suckers.
|
|
