Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [] Rebuttal to Microsoft's Pro-Lockin Shill (Rick Jelliffe)

  • Subject: [News] [] Rebuttal to Microsoft's Pro-Lockin Shill (Rick Jelliffe)
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:53:48 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Rick Jelliffe - myths debunked?

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft is attempting to roll these two separate issues (the decoding 
| problem and future encoding format) into the supposed "magic bullet" called 
| MSOOXML.  
| 
| And once we solve the problem of the decoding of our data ( a problem only 
| solvable by the vendor ), I and many National Bodies worldwide wholeheartedly 
| agree with the illustrious Mr Rick Jelliffe:  
| 
| 
|     "If you want something for interchange and if it is platform neutral, 
|     then I'd tend to ODF." 
`----

http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2007/06/rick_jelliffe_m.html

This man has a connection with Microsoft. It's a filthy exchnge of money.
Information control.


Related:

When is a standard not a standard?

,----[ Quote ]
| OOXML's method of dealing with the problem in effect locks out
| all applications that are not Microsoft Office, whereas ODF's
| method keeps the standard vendor neutral and usable by any
| office suite
`----

http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/node/2110


Novell's "Danaergeschenk", by Georg Greve

,----[ Quote ]
| So in the case of OpenXML, Microsoft now seems to be using Novell to
| put a pro forma implementation of OpenXML into OpenOffice.org, which
| will make it easier to migrate from OpenOffice.org to Microsoft
| Office but can never be sufficient to read all Microsoft Word Documents.
| 
| One reason for this is the sheer size of the implementation; another
| reason relates to the containers used within OpenXML, which make use
| of Microsoft's proprietary implementations instead of industry
| standards such as SVG. Moreover, there is really no knowing what
| kind of hooks Microsoft has put into the specification that people
| will not detect at first reading. Indeed, it is quite possible
| that OpenXML will allow what Bruce Perens refers to as "Predatory
| Pratices" in his definition of an Open Standard.
| 
| And while there will be a migration path from OpenOffice.org to
| Microsoft Office, Microsoft avoids opening the inverse path to
| any other ODF-compliant Office program, by neglecting ODF support
| in Microsoft Office.
| 
| [...]
| 
| Bob Sutor, IBM's Vice President of Standards and Open Source has
| written a good analysis why the specification is more akin to a
| denial of service attack than an Open Standard. OpenXML
| basically represents a change of strategy: Instead of trying
| to hide information by not telling anything about their products
| to anyone, they've apparently now switched to hiding information
| in noise, which is by far the more effective method.
`----

http://groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061208135621706

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index