On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 20:20:46 -0500, Dan C wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:01:01 -0400, CBFalconer wrote:
>
>> However it gets him listed in many PLONK files.
>
> Fix your non-compliant signature. It is TWICE the recommended number of
> lines.
Fix your attitude, that "rule" was never any more than a guideline.
Your whining about things like this wastes far more bandwidth.
> That line wouldn't have been visible in my reply editor if the proper sig
> delimiter was used, and I wouldn't be quoting it back...
Any such problem is at your end, his .sig starts "-- <newline>".
--
Phoenix
|
|
