BearItAll <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hadron Quark wrote:
>
>> BearItAll <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Clogwog wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/116377.asp
>>>> Next one? Roy Schestowitz?
>>>
>>> It would be nice to believe that these things are genuine. We do need to
>>> be in on the new smb spec. I hate being synical but can't help feeling
>>> this is to ensure that the new smb packets can not be used by Linux
>>> unless they agree to include closed source technologies.
>>
>> Are you *Still* harping on about the smb packets?
>>
>> A prime case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.
>>
>
> It isn't a little knowledge, have you studied the packet changes? I have.
>
So tell us again about how a new protocol might cause some hiccups. At
length. You know you want to.
And the response will be "so what" - the SW will change to cope with it.
--
Fatal Error: Found [MS-Windows] System -> Repartitioning Disk for Linux...
(By cbbrown@xxxxxx, Christopher Browne)
|
|
