On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:31:38 -0400, "Dr. Pain"
<ItHurtsSoGood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"dapunka" <dapunka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:1181600107.910183.214760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Dr. Pain wrote:
>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1348225.NeMinRvS3f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Expert opinion confirms manipulatability of voting computers
>>> >
>>> > ,----[ Quote ]
>>> > | The Chaos Computer Club has submitted to the German Federal
>>> > | Constitutional Court a 54-page expert opinion detailing
>>> > | serious flaws in the voting computers manufactured by the
>>> > | Dutch company Nedap, the German weekly newsmagazine Der
>>> > | Spiegel reports in its upcoming edition.
>>> > `----
>>> >
>>> > http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/90954/from/rss09
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> This article makes equal mention of Linux in voting machines as it does
>>> of
>>> Windows in voting machines.
>>
>> What a dick you are. The link you chose to reference doesn't mention
>> Windows or Linux. But the one from www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org
>> specifically mentions Windows failure, not Linux failure. The
>> biz.yahoo.com link discusses a change in Brazil away from Windows and
>> towards Linux. and the zdnet blog is a discussion about whether an
>> open source voting platform would be better than a closed one.
>> Still, wouldn't want the full facts to get in the way of a MSFT troll
>> would ya?
>>
>
>Listen up you little bitch. I didn't chose the link. It's the link that your
>fellow liar piece of shit troll Schestowitz posted. It's not my link... it's
>his. Do you get it now? Good.
>
>The link mentions a couple of hardware vulnerabilities. It makes no mention
>of software. Get that through your shit for brains head.
>
>
>- "But the one from www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org specifically mentions
>Windows failure, not Linux failure."
>
>Bull. Obviously you're a clueless moron. This link of yours doesn't mention
>Windows or lienux.
>
>Perhaps you or your troll boyfriend Roy Schestowitz would like to try again.
>
Thanks for you colorful contribution..by the way its "Linux" not
"lienux".
|
|
