On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:39:13 -0400, "Dr. Shlongwell \(aka your Boss\)"
<dShlong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"John Locke" <johnlocke98513@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:jtfi73tmi0ngm66emhp8pkf6jm5ekrubsu@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:30:30 -0400, "Dr. Shlongwell"
>> <dShlong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Damn idiot and liar. Nowhere does the article say anthing about this being
>>>a
>>>"Serious Flaw" you retard. So quit making up shite as you go along. Quit
>>>being a dishonest bitch and post what the story actually says, not what
>>>you
>>>wish it says.
>> "An attacker could use the flaw as part of a social-engineering ploy,
>> where users are tricked into doing something that puts their machine
>> at risk. For example, victims could receive an instant message from
>> someone who appears to have his boss's e-mail address."
>>
>> That would be considered serious by many people.
>
>Then show me someone credible who calls this serious. Roy Schestowitz
>doesn't count as he is an idiot. Is there a secunia security advisory out on
>this? Where can I find the security bulletin and security advisory on this
>oh so serious flaw.
>
>A loser like you ought to try this for a change - quit sucking up to your
>boyfriend and deal with the facts for a change. This 'serious flaw' simply
>lets somebody type in a bogus email address into their online profile.
>Wow-wee.
>
>And to Gordon - Most any email app/service lets people set their display
>name to anything they want. If someone is stupid enough to fall for it then
>they are born suckers.
>
>
Idoit ? Loser ? Liar ? Retard ? Stupid ? Born Suckers ?.... name
calling is a sign of desperation...you're right on par with
Balmer and the "mighty" Microsoft corporation.
|
|
