Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Click N Run For All

  • Subject: Re: Click N Run For All
  • From: Jamie Hart <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:27:41 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <uqudnRa5VosjNnHYnZ2dnUVZ_s-rnZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e9mpu2lr21co41ukpct4vmubvjhv0l81c9@4ax.com> <2912366.SP5UTeLiau@schestowitz.com> <478qu2hdrp206k6devge43ti3ma70v4fa6@4ax.com> <ubaqu21s32vdinbdep1tv22r1rb44i2hpi@4ax.com> <0ocqu29k7m3hilr3n8pc6bc0n2agqji0p3@4ax.com>
  • User-agent: Xnews/2006.08.24
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:501467
flyer <flyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:0ocqu29k7m3hilr3n8pc6bc0n2agqji0p3@
4ax.com:

> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:43:59 +0900, Wad <wad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>
>>>I don't follow you here. Anything bad avbout abbout CNR?
>>
>>
>>Sorry I just don't get it, what is the real advantage of CnR over
>>Synaptic or even simpy apt-get?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Wad
> 
> Sounds like a HUGE accessible repository. Great idea.
> 
Where do you think they'll get the packages compatible with that many 
distros?

My guess is that they'll take the packages from the distro repositories 
and simply make them available.

Nothing wrong with that of course, it will probably ease congestion on 
busy distro repositories.

> But Roy makes the point to watch some of these scumbags because they
> could end up controlling it adversly. Constant vigilance.
> 
So long as it's an add on extra it won't be a problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index