In comp.os.linux.advocacy, BearItAll
<spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:38:47 +0000
<1174408727.68411.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> http://jroes.sosdg.org/whatsgoingonhere.jpg
>>
>> WTF???
>>
>>
>
> Yes, that's right. Whats the problem?
>
> MS Virtual machine is apparently a successfull platform to load Linux onto.
I wouldn't doubt it, but wouldn't one want to load MS Windows into
a Linux virtual machine such as VmWare, QEMU, or other such instead? ;-)
> The list I saw was very extensive, every distro you could think of off the
> top of your head.
>
> I don't think we should grumble at that, I see it as a next generation Live
> linux, let them try it out in a VM, why not.
>
> I just tried to find the list for you that I found a while ago covering all
> of the OS's the MS VM has been tried with but I can't see it at the moment.
> I think I am searching for the wrong thing because I just keep ending up
> back at the java VM. Do MS call it by another name?
>
> I do remember though that as well as Linux there was OS/2 and others on that
> list. Mind, it has to be said that many off that list will have been
> installed but not necessarily properly tested, but still I have to say I
> was quite impressed.
>
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
If your CPU can't stand the heat, get another fan.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
