On Mar 17, 9:13 am, B Gruff <bbgr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2007 20:11 wylbur.horse...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > On Mar 16, 2:59 pm, Robert Parsonage <r...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> wylbur.horse...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >> [snip]
>
> >> Oh look, flatfish using another anonymous proxy. At least you are
> >> choosing proxies running a secure / stable OS these days.
>
> > Attack the messenger when you can't refute the message.
> > That's the first sign of a lamer.
>
> Precisely!
>
> - and that is *exactly* what *you*, under this nym and your many others,
> have done, and continue to do, isn't it?
> You go so far as to try to forge other people, in fact.
And of course you have proof of those statements?
Oh, I'm sorry, this is comp.os.linux.advocacy where no proof, at least
fron the Linux zealots, is required.
My bad.
> When you can't get your own way in one group, you slope off and post to
> others, or add cross-postings. You have gone so far that you have (under
> one of your nyms) been banned from Digg.
I've never had a nym under digg.
I have, and have always had, one name.
More of your lies and untruths that you can't prove.
> You are a pest, a wash-out, a loser, and a waste of time.
> In short, you are a Big Girl's Blouse, aren't you?
That sounds more like Roy to me.
A body builder who gets himself castrated so he can become a woman?
Now THAT"S one BIG blouse.
Since you appear to be a zealot in training, and not a very good one
at that, I will give you a hint:
You have it totally wrong.
|
|
