Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Linux vs. Windows: Which is Most Secure?
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | True to UNIX.
> | Qualitative score: Windows gets a D+ while Linux gets an A-.
> | "Bummer of a birthmark"
> | Qualitative score: Windows gets an F while Linux gets an A.
> | User data confidentiality.
> | Qualitative score: Windows gets a B- while Linux gets a B+.
> | Patch practices
> | Qualitative score: Windows gets an A- while Linux gets a B+.
> `----
>
> http://www.esecurityplanet.com/views/article.php/3665801
The first line of the article says it all:
| I'm more secure on Linux than I am on Windows. Yup, that's right. I
| have no doubt whatsoever that I am.
He should have said far more secure of course. The simple fact is any
OS currently available is more secure than Windows. Now the question
is: why is that? Why can't Microsoft develop an OS that has comparable
security to other OS's? That's a rhetorical question for the trolls.
|
|
