Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
> Kier wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 05 May 2007 14:22:25 -0500, AB wrote:
>>
>>> On 2007-05-05, Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>>>> On Sat, 05 May 2007 20:26:31 +0200, Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Hadron Quark is a rather stupid troll. Why do you think he has to label
>>>>> himself with "true linux advocate" or "kernel hacker"? Why do you think
>>>>> he
>>>>
>>>> He didn't. You did.
>>>
>
> Here we have the true Kier. Completely devoid of any reasoning.
You have to wonder which planet he's on.
> He has to defend the worthless troll, no matter what. Even to the point
> where he has to lie about the events which were happening.
> Ask yourself, Kier: Why do you (and only you) defend these worthless
> trolling swine? After al, Hadrin Quark is just one example of filth you
> felt the need to chime in and come to their rescue.
Oh, didn't you know? Kier's right & everyone else is wrong. I thought that was
obvious.
>>>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1b71cf72ec3d1081?dmode=source&hl=en
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2lxyjh
>>>
>>> No. I'm not. I'm a true Linux advocate who want to see it succeed.
>>> Not same brain dead hippy with an unfulfillable dream.
>>>
>>> It's at the bottom.
>>>
>>>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0ef580f0efc20026?dmode=source&hl=en
>>> http://tinyurl.com/yry3p3
>>>
>>> Scarily he is. And as a kernel hacker, I know him to be totally
>>> wrong.
>>>
>>> And justifying his remarks:
>>>
>>>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/01382227bd985da6?dmode=source&hl=en
>>> http://tinyurl.com/3cugp6
>>>
>>> Quoted from a previous message:
>>>
>>> >>> Everyone who uses Linux is a kernel hacker of some sort. There
>>> >>> is simply no way to avoid it.
>>
>> Okay, he said it. So what?
>
> Yes. He said it. Not me. Or anybody else in this group. *He* claims to be
> a "true linux advocate". Along with flatfish, of all people.
> He also claims to be a "kernel hacker".
> He is certainly the "kernel hacker" with the least amount of clue possible.
> Just read his (absolutely clueless) posts in the ubuntu group, and you know
> that "kernel hacker" is the label which fits the least with Hadron Quark.
> He knows next to nothing about linux. And that is the very reason why I
> think that he does *not* run it at all, or possibly just as a liveCD
>
>> Ever considered he said it because it's true?
>
> You are kidding, are you? You can't possibly mean that it could be true.
JHC, WTF is he smoking.
>
>> But of course, he's Hadron Quark, so of course he can't possibly be right.
>> Can't you see the fallacy of that?
>
> There is none. If you read his posts here in cola with an open mind, you can
> come to only one conclusion: He is a troll of the worst sort.
> Completely dishonest. *Nothing* he writes has any ring of truth to it
>
>>>
>>> There are plenty of others. Like his previous header that claimed he
>>> was working for CERN:
>>>
>>>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/152769d3540c68de?dmode=source&hl=en
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2x5hoc
>>>
>>> Organization: CERN LHC - http://public.web.cern.ch/public/
>>
>> He did not claim he *worked* for CERN. Ever.
>>
>
> No. He just implied it.
> Which is naturally totally fine. Absolutely innocent. After all, he "could"
> have worked for CERN. If he weren't such a totally clueless, lying asshole.
>
IBM, too IIRC.
> Now ask yourself: Who would do such things? And then again: Who does all
> these things combined? And is still innocent, like you assume with every
> troll who comes along (and recognized as such by anybody else)
|
|