__/ [ flyer ] on Thursday 17 May 2007 01:59 \__
> In article <1179345523.268564.31570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> raylopez99@xxxxxxxxx says...
>> On May 16, 10:04 am, John Bailo <jaba...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>> > > The holder of the Linux trademark suggests Microsoft should name the
>> > > patents it alleges have been violated so the claims can be tested in
>> > > court.
>> >
>> > Microsoft should be being pursued with due diligence by the FTC and SEC.
>> >
>> > These kind of "vague announcements" soil the waters of the market.
>> >
>> > If they can't back up their claims truthfully, then they've exposed
>> > themselves to litigation.
>>
>> And how does King Penguin know that MSFT violates other people's
>> patents? He needs to put a sock in it, instead of spreading IP FUD.
>>
>> MSFT will name patents when they file their lawsuit--if and when they
>> do.
>>
>> RL
>
> Oh you mean like SCO named various code. Like that?
>
> Speaking of socks, please wash yours. It's affecting your reasoning.
>
> MS is sitting on so many crimes hidden within their mass confusion they
> call code, that the only thing they can do is bury the crap and start
> over with attempting to screw the worlds patent system. This will fail.
>
> Their only direction is down.
Just plonk RL. He's a troll whose money is admittedly in Microsoft's stock.
It's just as bad as Larry 'Qualig', former Microsoft employee, who comes to
a Linux forum only to serve his stock/prospects. John Bailo does that with
Novell. This is a Linux advocacy forum. Join in, advocate Linux, or butt
out.
--
~~ Best regards
Roy S. Schestowitz | Billigator: eats your filesystem alive
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 23.8% user, 4.0% system, 0.6% nice, 71.6% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
