In comp.os.linux.advocacy, cc
<scatnubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on 14 May 2007 04:10:54 -0700
<1179141054.601588.124830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On May 12, 10:19 am, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Why Doesn't Microsoft Have A Cult Religion?
>
> A cult religion is never ever a good thing.
>
Indeed, as evidenced by the Amiga, which died a horrible
death at the hands of Microsoft (or was it Commodore's
mismanagement of its assets?), by the Jamestown massacre
in which 900+ people drank poison drink (not to worry,
Mister Gates; you're not involved in that conspiracy! :-) ),
and of course by Linux, which has a bunch of fanatics such
as IBM and HP....
Oh wait, those aren't fanatics, those are profitable
corporations. Damn!
Well, never mind, Microsoft's more profitable than IBM
and HP anyway. Therefore, IBM and HP are just mere cult
religions -- which happen to make billions per year, though
not quite to the level of Microsoft's tens of billions.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux makes one use one's mind.
Windows just messes with one's head.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
