Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Schestowitz debunked

  • Subject: Re: Schestowitz debunked
  • From: cc <scatnubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 14 May 2007 03:26:16 -0700
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <MPG.20b1b98d892cbf6b98971e@news.lafn.org>
  • Injection-info: u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.81.179.66; posting-account=iV1-IA0AAACr6SRlBDB8SHJD-SBPrpX6
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <4644723e$0$2286$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com> <MPG.20aedd4ddaa80ab198971a@news.lafn.org> <4645c49b$0$2282$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com> <1178980506.035869.175060@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <MPG.20b1b98d892cbf6b98971e@news.lafn.org>
  • User-agent: G2/1.0
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:524773
On May 14, 4:11 am, flyer <f...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <1178980506.035869.175...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> scatnu...@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 12, 9:45 am, "amicus_curious" <A...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > "flyer" <f...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> > >news:MPG.20aedd4ddaa80ab198971a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > > > In article <4644723e$0$2286$ec3e2...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > > > A...@xxxxxxx says...
> > > >> Read all about it:
>
> > > >>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=247&tag=nl.e622
>
> > > > An idiot attempting the impossible.
>
> > > > The only way to sucessfully "debunk" Schestowitz is to somehow remove all
> > > > his postings.
>
> > > > That will be difficult.
>
> > > > Keep reading ALL the news about a degraded Microsoft, and as well all the
> > > > news about Linux assuming strong positions in industry and elsewhere all
> > > > over the world.
>
> > > > Read 'em and weep shills.
>
> > > > No way to stop THIS flood spud.
>
> > > I read them and chuckle about how shallow, superficial, and repetitive they
> > > are.  When you add this silly parade to his grossly uninformed opinions on
> > > finance and business in general, it is a great comfort to the Microsoft fans
> > > to know how inept and ineffective the OSS opposition appears to be.  The
> > > only caution is to not become too complacent.
>
> > > The flood of trivia posted here mostly affects the OSS proponents anyway,
> > > preventing them from putting forth any meaningful thoughts of their own.
>
> > 99% of the posters here have nothing to do with OSS other than the
> > fact that they use it. You could hardly consider them OSS opposition.
> > They have never contributed one line of code back to the community.
> > All Microsoft fans can take comfort in is the fact that there is a
> > centralized place to keep the retarded loonies and that it's fun to
> > post here.
>
> I see that you are just a bit stupid.
>
> 1/2 Linux USERS  +  1/2 Linux CODERS  =  100% Microsoft REPLACEMENT
> community.

50% of the Linux community are coders? Or 50% of the Linux community
contributes code back?


> Even FURTHER bad new for you is that thay ALL promote Linux.
>
> Give it up punk.

Give up what? I use Linux. I've contributed code to the kernel. I've
contributed code to applications because I needed something that
worked and I had to do it myself. You sit here and spout off made up
equations that don't make sense. Maybe you should give it up.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index