Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: the alternative OS ..

  • Subject: Re: the alternative OS ..
  • From: Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:05:12 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <f3cd6v$e6r$1@news.datemas.de> <1210318.UC75SKMxgL@schestowitz.com> <J2S6i.14525$Ut6.13785@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
  • User-agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:528912
On Tue, 29 May 2007 09:06:49 +0000, croaker wrote:

> On Mon, 28 May 2007 01:39:08 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> 
>> __/ [ Doug Mentohl ] on Sunday 27 May 2007 17:54 \__
>> 
>>> "there's never been a better time to buy an alternative OS"
>>> 
>>> "Take Ubuntu Linux. This has rapidly become one of the most popular
>>> Linux distributions, and with pretty good reason. Installation is a snap
>>> ? just a few clicks and you?re up and running"
>>> 
>>> http://www.e-academy.ltd.uk/news/news.asp?NewsID=113
>> 
>> Equivalent != surrogate != alternative != cheap replacement.
>> 
>> Needs some work on terminology there. :-)
>>
> 
> ubuntu isn't bad but it has aways to go before it is as good as mandriva.

My most recent experiences of Mandriva haven't been very positive,
unfortunately (it's been my favourite distro since I started out with
Linux a few years ago). Though I've mainly switched to SUSE, I've also had
good results with several Ubuntu versions.

-- 
Kier


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index