Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
> Teaching Microsoft: the aftermath
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | I leave it to you to decide whether that is sufficient cause to beb
> | anned or a valid comment. I never expected to follow the fate of
> | Groklaw. Let's see what comes next.. I can only say that I'm a real
> | person and I'm not paid or sponsored by IBM. Just your average blogger.
> `----
>
> http://thebeez.vnunetblogs.com/the_beez_speaks/2007/05/teaching_micros.html
Ah yes, MacCormack's infamous, Microsoft sponsored, anti-GPL "study"
based on a /whopping/ 34 respondents. That was hilarious enough, but
then the Microsoft sponsored rebuttal to Bezemer's criticism was even
funnier.
> Was that a Microsoft apologist or is it LIC (see below)?
>
> The Linux Insecurity Complex
No, Rufus really is a Microsoft apologist. In fact he's probably an
employee.
And right now, I'd say that it's *Microsoft* and their supporters who
are feeling insecure and paranoid, with good reason. They can feel the
dictatorship slipping away.
--
K.
http://slated.org
,----
| <This sig left intentionally blank>
`----
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.20-1.2312.fc5
21:08:49 up 41 days, 18:40, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.09, 0.13
|
|