In article <2359882.bmGHT8GO5u@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> __/ [ flyer ] on Monday 21 May 2007 07:22 \__
>
> > In article <1206519.BFI1AEujOP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> >> Taking a cynical view of open source
> >>
> >> ,----[ Quote ]
> >> | The vendors were tripping over themselves swearing allegiance to the
> >> | open source movement. It was like Republicans genuflecting at the
> >> | graven image of Ronald Reagan. They were testifying that the Really
> >> | Smart Enterprise Users (RSEU) were demanding, actually demanding,
> >> | lots of solutions here. And each of them was going to be first
> >> | in line.
> >> `----
> >>
> >> http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/tech/8932218FC099AE3CCC2572DE007D14E7
> >>
> >> What a waste of bandwidth. How much do these people get paid to spew out a
> >> bunch of streotypes?
> >>
> >
> > Just more evidence that Linux is ripping reality open with a new game in
> > town.
> >
> > Stupid MS must be freaking. They can't fight it.
>
> With stereotypes.
>
> The Enderle shill has hit another article. He was trying to suggest that
> Linux={no development} or {no money}. Among other stereotype: "zealous",
> "cheap"... haven't heard the Enderle shill using the "communist" steretype
> yet, but he sort of did this when Cuba wrote a new software policy.
>
> Nowadays, it seems like his reputation has sunk and he cannot get his
> 'material' published, so he pays to have it enter some wires. Word on the
> street is that the Lyons shill has got the same problem. Both are using
> blogs now because the media probably revealed who /sponsors/ their
> 'opinions'.
>
> Shills belong in jail.
>
>
Heh heh, and bought souls end up in hell.
|
|