Hadron wrote:
> spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> In the sacred domain of comp.os.linux.advocacy,
>> Almond <almond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> didnst hastily scribble thusly:
>>> In article <1detv4-g07.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Richardson
>>> <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>>On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 23:23:34 -0400,
>>>> Enzyte Bob <bigbob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Which of the nymshifters are you?
>>
>>> Get lost, you stoopid megalomaniac
>>> with all these PGP bullshit.
>>
>>> Who da funk you think you are, mr. jackarse?
>>
>> Awww, what's a matter? Does his use of PGP make it difficult to forge
>> him?
>
> So you verified the signature did you?
>
That's irrelevant
What *is* relevant though that it makes it mightily difficult to forge him
Come on, Hadron Quark, jackass in all trades (and totally clueless too),
show us how to forge him
Idiot
--
If you're right 90% of the time, why quibble about the remaining 3%?
|
|
