On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 09:39:29 -0500, Jeremy Wembley <Jermwembley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"Kier" <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:pan.2007.11.04.14.21.13.166816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:41:31 -0500, Jeremy Wembley wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Sinister Midget" <sinister.midget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1194120733.226505.108220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> I hope that his masters pay him well to sell his credibility like this
>>>> and post what he knows are lies. But the child does seem to be self
>>>> destructing. He's frantically posting faster and faster and making up
>>>> more lies and intentionally misleading subject lines than ever before.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that his masters who pay him a few pence for posting this
>>>> tripe are not happy with him. It seems that Microsoft is doing quite
>>>> well. His bosses who pay him to shill for linux want more production
>>>> from him or he will lose his pathetic job.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyone who spends hours and hours spamming all of these newsgroups and
>>> websites is either being paid or is a mental case. No "normal person"
>>> wastes this much time (including all of Christmas day) posting all of
>>> these
>>> lies.
>>
>> What 'normal' person spends their life nymshifting in order to slander
>> Linux advocates,
>I have nothing against "Linux advocates" - I do however take exception to
>LIARS who intentionally make up false and deceiving headlines in order to
>"advocate" linux.
>> the way you do, scum?
>Unlike Roy Schestowitz, at least I do not receive money for my posts.
Sure. And we beleive you when you post "I'm not lying."
|
|
