Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] First Benchmark of ATI/AMD Open Source Driver vs Binary Blob

  • Subject: [News] First Benchmark of ATI/AMD Open Source Driver vs Binary Blob
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:56:14 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
ATI Open vs. Closed-Source AIGLX Performance

,----[ Quote ]
| While sitting within the GNOME desktop and just having one Nautilus window 
| open, using the Radeon driver had a reported 111 frames per second according 
| to Compiz Benchmark while the fglrx driver performance was nearly double that 
| with 194 frames per second.   
`----

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=900&num=1


Related:

AMD 8.41 Display Driver Preview

,----[ Quote ]
| Whether you are using a Radeon X300 purchased a few years ago or the Radeon 
| X1950PRO, the 8.41 driver is noticeably faster. How much faster? In many 
| cases it is about 50% faster while in some configurations it may go as high 
| as 90% or more. In fact, in some benchmarks the Mobility Radeon X300 was over 
| 10x faster!    
`----

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=821&num=1


AMD Delivers Significant Graphics Performance and Compatibility Enhancements
for Consumer Linux Users

,----[ Quote ]
| Moving forward, AMD also plans to accelerate efforts to address the needs of 
| the open source community as well. 
| 
| "As client computing on Linux continues to grow so has our support and focus 
| on delivering best-in-class performance and compatibility for our products," 
| said Ben Bar-Haim, vice president of software, Graphics Product Group at AMD.
`----

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070905/20070904006432.html?.v=1


What 10,000+ People Say About Linux Graphics

,----[ Quote ]
| ==============
| Which video adapter brand(s) do you use in your Linux system(s)?
| ==============
| Intel: 15.17%
| ATI: 31.87%
| NVIDIA: 48.16%
| Matrox: 1.41%
| SiS / XGI: 1.61%
| Other: 1.75%
`----

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=889&num=1


,----[ Quote ]
| It has been 80 days since the last NVIDIA Linux display driver was released.
| 
| [...]
| 
| This week is already very busy with the X Developer Summit going on where AMD 
| will be releasing their new ATI R500/600 open-source driver as well as the 
| specifications and it's very likely that the new NVIDIA 100.xx.xx series 
| driver will meet the world in the coming days.   
`----

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjA0NA


NVIDIA: Got Specifications?

,----[ Quote ]
| This past week AMD raised the Linux graphics bar by not only announcing their 
| new fglrx graphics driver, which delivers Radeon HD 2000 support, immense 
| performance improvements, and AIGLX, but it was accompanied by an 
| announcement that they will be delivering specifications to the X.Org 
| development community. These two announcements came after intense work 
| internally at AMD and over a long period of time, but literally overnight it 
| changed the minds of many Linux users on how they judge this company with its 
| once notorious binary blob. AMD has really set a precedence for showing that 
| a semiconductor company once criticized to no end with their proprietary 
| software can update their views to assist and embrace the open-source Linux 
| community while remaining competitive as a company in a triopoloy market. 
| They have also thus reaffirmed that Linux is a viable desktop operating 
| system. But the ball has now landed in NVIDIA's court. NVIDIA can either play 
| ball by pushing forward with a similar effort, and then all of the big three  
| GPU manufacturers would be cradling an open-source strategy, or they may find 
| themselves in trouble down the road.              
`----

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=831&num=1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index