Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] GNU/Linux Well Suited for the Security-Unconscious (Polite Term for "n00b")

  • Subject: [News] GNU/Linux Well Suited for the Security-Unconscious (Polite Term for "n00b")
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:43:58 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Windows Is The Wrong System For the Security-Unconscious

,----[ Quote ]
| She uses Windows. Worse, she uses AOL. A virus on top of a virus. Great.
| 
| [...]
| 
| Microsoft has given technical 3-year-olds the keys to the car (a Yugo, at 
| that), released the parking brake, and - with little, if any information on 
| how to operate the car - told them to drive. The result is that many novices 
| have no clue about looking both ways before crossing the street. They know 
| nothing about needing to change the oil every so often, or to rotate the 
| tires. That is, these people know precious little about maintenance and 
| safety, both of which are crucial in a connected world.      
| 
| The ramifications go beyond potential harm to the novice user in question. 
| The real danger is that, without any real grasp of how to stay safe on the 
| Internet, these people endanger everyone they come into contact with, 
| regardless of whether they happen to be on the virtual highway at the same 
| time. On top of that, consider the relational damage when family members and 
| friends attempt to navigate the muddy waters of netiquette and/or lost data 
| because one person thoughtlessly passed along some spam with a payload.      
`----

http://blue-gnu.biz/content/windows_wrong_system_security_unconscious

Everybody suffers.

Stop the botnets!

,----[ Quote ]
| This is the intention of Paul Barford, a computer scientist at the University 
| of Wisconsin-Madison. He wants to build a new line of defense against 
| malicious traffic which has become today a billion-dollar 'shadow industry.'  
`----

http://www.primidi.com/2007/11/09.html#a2003


Related:

Why Windows is less secure than Linux

,----[ Quote ]
| Windows is inherently harder to secure than Linux. There I said
| it. The simple truth.
| 
| Many millions of words have been written and said on this topic.
| I have a couple of pictures.
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=311


Linux more secure than Windows, national survey shows

,----[ Quote ]
| In its first annual Security Issues Survey for the debut of the Software 
| Security Summit conference in La Jolla, California, BZ Research polled 
| 6,344 software development managers about the security of different popular 
| enterprise operating environments and Linux and open source consistently 
| topped Microsoft Windows, according to respondents.
`----

http://www.xomba.com/linux_more_secure_than_windows_national_survey_shows


Linux Security: A Big Edge Over Windows

,----[ Quote ]
| Linux is better at locking down a computer than Windows. The Linux OS
| uses configuration settings and user permissions to a much more
| efficient degree than the Windows administrator account. To do
| this, non-enterprise users should seek help from third-party
| security suites that serve as configuration managers, James
| Bottomley, chief technology officer of SteelEye Technology said.
`----

http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/54742.html


How secure are Linux, Window and Mac OS?

,----[ Quote ]
| Overall it looks like the Linux kernel turns out to be the most
| secure system. Not only does it have virtually no security holes
| that lead to system access, it's also very resilient to remote
| attacks, two areas where both Windows and Mac OS X aren't doing
| very well.
`----

http://www.masuran.org/node/29


If Only We Knew Then What We Know Now About Windows XP

,----[ Quote ]
| You can think of Windows XP as a house with a second floor built of
| spackle, wood filler and duct tape.
`----

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/23/AR2006092300510.html?nav=rss_technology

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index