On Nov 28, 11:52 am, flatfish <flatf...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:50:58 +0000, Kier <val...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Then why did you quote your own post, unecessarily? Are you too dim to
> >know what you're doing?
>
> It was 2 different threads.
> Live with it.
>
> >Only the first line or two. That was quite enough.
>
> That's all it takes baby to get you hooked!
>
>
>
> >> (BTW in case you haven't noticed, you'll be reading Schestowitz's spam
> >> at least 8 times under different misleading subject lines. He thinks
> >> people don't notice. Maybe you haven't? )
>
> >Who said I read it? It's not spam anyway, and you saying it day and night
> >will never make it so. Maybe you should crawl back into the hole you
> >crawled out of, since you're making so little contribution to Linux
> >advocacy.
>
> Why not read digg and see what THAT community thinks of Roy and his
> spam?
>
> Here, I'll even get you started!
>
> http://digg.com/apple/Massive_Data_Loss_Bug_in_Leopard?t=10359262#c10...
>
> Roy Schestowitz is at -100 on that one.
>
> A comment that says:
>
> " You should see him in comp.os.linux.advocacy!! Spamming the entire
> group with 1000s of posts each month.
> He's turned that group into a virtual wasteland of messages with
> little or no replies. He's also been asked, many times, to group his
> messages into a digest, maybe even with html hot links, but he refuses
> because his goal is to pollute the search engines with his name.
> I have him filtered in comp.os.linux.advocacy, like most people in the
> group do."
>
> Is at +23.
>
> Another one which says:
>
> "According to his Google profile, he has *forty thousand* (!) posts to
> COLA alone. Add to that 11,000+ to Digg, and who knows where else. For
> all we know "he" has a Slashdot account with another five thousand.
> "He" runs what, like five or six high-volume "boycottX.com" attack
> blogs?
> Does anyone still believe that this "guy" is just a kid getting a
> masters' degree or whatever he claims he does for a living? Please.
> Schez smells like paid astroturfers, shills and trolls."
>
> Is at +20
>
> Another one which says:
>
> "@HonoredMule: The erratic behavior you see is caused by multiple
> people posting under the same identity. It's easy enough to see."
>
> Is at +6
>
> And another one that says:
>
> " I have noticed that the quality of "his" comments, and also "his"
> general attitude tends to shift erratically. 3-4 months ago, he earned
> a blocking by me. About 2 months ago, I unblocked him, and then later
> thought highly enough of his posts to add him as a friend, but the
> content he submitted was on a short-term high that quickly degenerated
> back into novell hate-spam and random linux-related crap. Lately, his
> comments have also degenerated back to block-worthiness loaded with "I
> can talk about linux stuff too, and I give this article a B+" junk. I
> didn't know he was so active in other communities too, but he sure as
> hell doesn't have time for this if he's actually a student, at least
> unless we're the test subjects for his thesis"
>
> Is also at +6
>
> Now to put this into perspective, this is a LINUX GROUP ON DIGG!
> It attracts LINUX SUPPORTERS so it will tend to be skewed in that
> direction.
>
> So how come THEY, the REAL Linux supporters, have Roy Schestowitz all
> figured out and comp.os.linux.advocacy is way behind the curve.
>
> And don't think this is an isolated incident.
> There are plenty of other examples.
>
> Considering Roy Schestowitz posts to groups that are supposedly his
> life, IOW Linux, his MISERABLE digg rating of -0.6 says it all.
>
> Why are you COLA'ites so ignorant?
Dear Keith, uh, flat..., uh, can't you think of a new nym today? Good
sockpuppet work, though. I'm sure you wrote those replies on digg,
given how you like to play cheering section for yourself. What do
they give you, 25 cents for digg post, and 30 cents for a new nym on
cola? That would make you, let's see...pretty rich by now!
Fortunately, your puppet meisters can afford the bill.
Best wishes, N.
|
|
