Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] ASUSTek Argues It Now Complies with the GPL, Announces Eee PC Linux SDK

  • Subject: [News] ASUSTek Argues It Now Complies with the GPL, Announces Eee PC Linux SDK
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:26:20 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
ASUSTek is committed to meet the requirements of the GNU General Public License 

,----[ Quote ] 
| The open source code for EeePC is available here. To download the source code 
| of all open source software packages that are included in the product, follow 
| the steps listed below.  
| 
| [...]
| 
| Asus is also pleased to announce the upcoming release of the Eee PC SDK.
`----

http://eeepc.asus.com/en/news11272007.htm

In Defense of The GPL  

,----[ Quote ]
| Ravicher, however, said it is not yet clear whether the BusyBox litigation 
| has had a measurable impact on proper GPL usage or caused potential violators 
| to clean up their acts.  
`----

http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3712896


Related:

ASUS eeePC: First impressions and GPL violations

,----[ Quote ]
| What you won't find on that site are sources. ASUS is bound by the GPL to 
| make the sources for the software they're distributing available, even if 
| they have not modified them. (Check the license if you don't believe me.) 
| ASUS has posted a 1.8GB ZIP file on their website that they claim is the 
| sources, but it's not -- it contains a few .debs (not even the versions that 
| ship on the machine) and some kernel headers. (Perhaps they figured nobody 
| would pull 1.8GB from their slow-as-molasses site and find out.)      
`----

http://cliffhacks.blogspot.com/2007/11/asus-eeepc-first-impressions-and-gpl.html


Asus eeePC violates GPL say Linux stalwarts

,----[ Quote ]
| Members of the Linux community have complained that the hot new sub-notebook 
| from Asus, the eeePC, may have violated the spirit of the Linux General 
| Public License (GPL).  
`----

http://www.itwire.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15490&mosmsg=Thanks+for+your+vote%21


Asus Eee PC doing well

,----[ Quote ]
| It appears that this holiday season the gPC is not the only mainstream Linux 
| PC to get a lot of attention. The Asus Eee PC, a $400 laptop that runs a 
| basic version of Linux, is sold out at Amazon and Best Buy, where it has 
| received a 4.5/5 user rating at both places.    
`----

http://www.linuxloop.com/news/2007/11/24/asus-eee-pc-doing-well/


The Asus Eee Laptop Series Selling Off the Shelves World Wide

,----[ Quote ]
| The sturdy and light weight Asus Eee has captured the hearts and minds of US 
| consumers, students and educators. The Eee series has all the features of its 
| competitors, but its affordable price is turning heads. The Eee units are 
| literally selling off the shelves world-wide.   
| 
| [...]
| 
| The popular Eee is not without its critics. IT Wire reports that Asus Eee may 
| have misrepresented the Linux loaded capabilities. According to IT Wire, some 
| Linux advocates say the Eee uses Xandros a Debian-based distribution that 
| charges a license fee and has an agreement with Microsoft similar to the one 
| signed by Novell.    
`----

http://www.physorg.com/news115288648.html


Second Round of GPL Infringement Lawsuits Filed on Behalf of BusyBox Developers

,----[ Quote ]
| The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) today announced that it has filed two 
| more copyright infringement lawsuits on behalf of its clients, two principal 
| developers of BusyBox, alleging violation of the GNU General Public License 
| (GPL). The defendants in the lawsuits are Xterasys Corporation and High-Gain 
| Antennas, LLC. BusyBox is a lightweight set of standard Unix utilities 
| commonly used in embedded systems and is open source software licensed under 
| GPL version 2.      
`----

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/nov/20/busybox/


Is the Monsoon settlement a missed opportunity?

,----[ Quote ]
| Certainly more was hoped for from the first US GPL lawsuit. “This case is 
| very important because it will establish what type of remedies (either 
| contract or copyright) are available to licensors for breach of the GPLv2,” 
| wrote Mark Radcliffe at the time the complaint was filed.   
| 
| However, for those looking for legal precedent, all may not be lost. “Stay 
| tuned, however, as this is likely not the last lawsuit we will see here in 
| the U.S. to enforce the terms of the GPL,” notes Haislmaier.  
`---- 

http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/31/is-the-monsoon-settlement-a-missed-opportunity/


Do Microsoft's EULAs have any real legal basis?

,----[ Quote ]
| "Microsoft has no special exemption from the sale of goods act." Well,
| no, probably not - but it might still be selling you "services"
| instead of "goods". But the real point to remember is that it doesn't
| matter a jot what the "logical" position is, it is what the courts
| decide that matters.
| 
| As far as I know, no one has tested Microsoft's EULAs in a UK court
| and, until someone does, Microsoft will just go on assuming that they
| work. And I don't fancy the risk of taking on Microsoft's expensive
| lawyers in court myself...
`----

http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/04/25/microsoft_eula/


BusyBox Developers and Monsoon Multimedia Agree to Dismiss GPL Lawsuit

,----[ Quote ]
| The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) and Monsoon Multimedia today jointly 
| announced that an agreement has been reached to dismiss the GPL enforcement 
| lawsuit filed by SFLC on behalf of two principal developers of BusyBox.  
`----

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/oct/30/busybox-monsoon-settlement/


And Just Like That, The Games End — First Ever GPL Lawsuit Dismissed

,----[ Quote ]
| In the agreement to dismiss the lawsuit, the SFLC is reporting that Monsoon 
| Multimedia has agreed to appoint an “Open Source Compliance Officer” within 
| its organization “to monitor and ensure GPL compliance, to publish the source 
| code for the version of BusyBox it previously distributed on its web site, 
| and to undertake substantial efforts to notify previous recipients of BusyBox 
| from Monsoon Multimedia of their rights to the software under the GPL.     
| 
| [...]
| 
| Stay tuned, however, as this is likely not the last lawsuit we will see here 
| in the U.S. to enforce the terms of the GPL. 
`----

http://thinkingopen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/and-just-like-that-the-games-end-first-ever-gpl-lawsuit-dismissed/


SFLC: Setting Legal Precedent Not the Goal of GPL Case

,----[ Quote ]
| Software Freedom Law Center co-founder Dan Ravicher says the Center’s 
| copyright infringement case against Monsoon Multimedia on behalf of the  
| creators of BusyBox is not about setting legal precedent for the use and 
| interpretation of the GNU General Public License.   
`----

http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/osb/?p=241


GPL defenders say: See you in court

,----[ Quote ]
| The license also requires anyone distributing GPL software, in an executable 
| form that a computer can run, to make the complete source code available. One 
| example: Cisco Systems subsidiary Linksys, which  shares the GPL software 
| used in its wireless networking equipment.   
`----

http://www.news.com/GPL-defenders-say-See-you-in-court/2100-7344_3-6210837.html


First U.S. GPL lawsuit heads for quick settlement

,----[ Quote ]
| The first U.S. GPL-related lawsuit appears to be headed for a quick 
| out-of-court settlement. Monsoon Multimedia admitted today that it had 
| violated the GPLv2 (GNU General Public License version 2), and said it will 
| release its modified BusyBox code in full compliance with the license.   
`----

http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS3761924232.html


New Method To Detect and Prove GPL Violations

,----[ Quote ]
| "A paper to be presented at the upcoming academic conference Automated 
| Software Engineering describes a new method to detect code theft and could be 
| used to detect GPL violations in particular. While the co-called birthmarking  
| method is demonstrated for Java, it is general enough to work for other 
| languages as well..."   
`----

http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/25/1648253&from=rss


German Court convicted Skype of violating the GPL

,----[ Quote ]
| German district court Munich has convicted Skype of violating the GPL. One of 
| the VoIP telephones sold by Skype run Linux, but the GPL text was not handed 
| out together with the phone, although the GPL requires that.  
`----

http://liquidat.wordpress.com/2007/07/24/german-court-convicted-skype-of-violating-the-gpl/#comment-27057


German GPL defender claims legal victory
 
,----[ Quote ]
| Open-source programmer Harald Welte said Thursday he won a civil court
| case in Germany centered on the General Public License (GPL). The license
| governs many open-source projects and permits anyone to use software
| covered by it, but requires that companies incorporating GPL software
| make the underlying source code available.
`----

http://news.com.com/2061-10795_3-6113453.html?part=rss&tag=6113453&subj=news


gpl-violations.org project prevails in court case on GPL violation by D-Link

,----[ Quote ]
| D-Link Germany GmbH, a subsidiary of D-Link Corporation, Taiwan R.O.C.,
| distributed DSM-G600, a network attached storage (NAS) device which uses a
| Linux-based Operating System.  However, this distribution was incompliant 
| with the GNU General Public License (GPL) which covers the Linux Kernel and
| many other software programs used in the product.
`----

http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html


Wallace's Appeal Firmly Rejected - GPL Has Nothing to Fear [pdf]

,----[ Quote ]
| PJ: "Just so you know, Daniel Wallace's appeal of the ruling
| against him in his pro se quest to overthrow the GPL on antitrust
| grounds, one of SCO's daydreams too, has been firmly rejected by
| the appeals court, as I knew it would be."
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/WallaceAppealRejected.pdf


Would Dostoevsky Use the GPL?

,----[ Quote ]
| I get nervous whenever large software shops talk up the virtues of a license 
| with fewer protections of developer and user rights. In the linked articles 
| above, there is talk of permissive licenses being the path of least 
| resistance, with the premise that it's "easier" to gravitate towards them. My 
| question is - easier for whom? Easier for the developers or easier for the 
| companies who wish to make use of it without those annoying obligations to 
| the greater free software ecosystem? As is often mentioned by others smarter 
| than me, a scenario where developers gravitate towards permissive licenses 
| makes it easier for companies to avoid community reciprocity.        
`----

http://tinosc.blogspot.com/2007/09/would-dostoevsky-use-gpl.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index